LEGAL NOTICE THAT THE CITY ST.PAUL VIA DFL MAYOR CHRIS COLEMAN EXPLOITING THE ELDERLY,DISABLED TO STEAL JOHN CARLONE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, SHARONS CARS,TRAILERS, EVEN SHARONS PORTA POTTY FOR CHRIS COLEMANS AND HIS DSI EMPLOYEES PECUNIARY GAIN. TRIGGERS DEATH,DISABILITYS,DISPARAGMENT OF TITLES, SCROOL BELOR FOR JOHN CARLENE
n wake of veto and Supreme Court decision, St. Paul scrambles to adopt smaller budget - MinnPost
Living in the moment John Carlone age 83 is a tiger
To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
CC: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Sent: 12/8/2016 12:44:49 P.M. Central Standard Time
Subj: City of Saint Paul - File #: RLH SAO 16-47185 ComoJohnCarlone
Note to John Carlone Thanks4speaking on Cable
Dai Thoa also issued the Resolution to keep Donald Trump from the City of St. Paul,MNDaio Thoa the Asian Counsel man, very small in stature has exceeded his Jurisdiction/Authority, complicit with Russ Stark PresCouncil and Attorney Tierney-Gunderson ie Sam Clark.Affiant watching John Carlone age 80+ the Video must go ViralTo tow Construction Equipment before Permit of 14Dec issue,i. Then to tow Equipment back 4 Construction is Bizzare.
Supervisor Lisa Martin was married to the convicted Murder Aaron Foster and was joined in the Steinhauser Law Suits
File #: RLH SAO 16-47 Version: 1
Type: Resolution LH Summary Abatement Order
Title: Appeal of John Carlone to Summary and Vehicle Abatement Orders at 185 COMO AVENUE.
Minutes note: John Carlone, owner, appeared. Supervisor Lisa Martin: -Summary Abatement Order was issued Nov 9, 2016 to remove TV, tarp, vehicle, furniture, appliances, construction debris, etc, from Marion Blvd and the property -I also issued Orders on 3 WI vehicles, licensed as RVs that have expired tabs -I spoke with Mr. Carlone who said that one is a construction trailer; he plans to build on the site -I contacted Capitol Area Architectural Planning Board and spoke to Peter Musty, who forwarded an email that I sent to you this morning in which they stated that there is no approved plan submitted and they would not allow the storage of any construction materials or vehicles on that property -photos, email in the file (attached) Ms. Moermond: -did you hear that? Mr. Carlone: -I did hear her and I know, generally, what she's talking about -there are 3 vehicles on the property; 1 is a lunch trailer; 1 is a took shed; and the other one is a field office for construction work -the property is zoned commercial and there's been a lot of improvements done to it; we're waiting for a surveying company (brought their info) to do a survey on the property; then, we're going to bring our plan (also has) of a house that we're going to build on the property; my son and I are going to build it for myself and my wife and we're going to live there -the equipment that is there is not road-worthy; it's construction equipment and after we get a building permit and start excavation, we will have to bring in a back-hoe, 4 dump trucks, a bulldozer, and all kinds of building materials; then, everything will be moved -if we had to moved the equipment that's there right now, it would be a burden to my wife & I because it cost us over $1000 to move it there; it would cost another $1000 to take it away; another $1000 to bring it back and another $1000 to take it away after the building is built; and at this time of the year, we can't build because there's frost in the ground -we have to get these plans approved from Mr. Musty, CAAPB -at first, we were going to build a commercial building; then, we realized that there isn't enough parking there for what would be needed; so, we decided to go residential -it will take only 90 days to build it but we won't be able to start until Apr 1, 2017, probably -our construction office is used for doing the plans, etc. -the equipment that's there is not being used and it's not storage; it's equipment that we use on every job that we go on -I was a small general contractor for a while; also in the building trades; I worked for the Army Corps of Engineers for about 3 years; and every job needs a field office, a tool shed and a lunch room for the men -the equipment is clean; there's no debris on this lot -we put down a base material so the equipment would be high & dry; and we put a security fence around the whole area Ms. Moermond: -those vehicles are parked illegally on a vacant lot Mr. Carlone: -they aren't illegally parked because it's a commercial lot under construction Ms. Moermond: -it's not under construction; you don't have a building permit; it's construction related for a particular project with a permit that's been pulled Mr. Carlone: -we put in 50 ton of stabilized aggregate Ms. Moermond: -and that would require a permit; don't know if you have that Mr. Carlone: -excavation does not require a permit Ms. Moermond: -after a certain volume of material, it does require a permit Mr. Carlone: -not according to all the years I've been contracting Ms. Moermond: -this is not a legal parking surface in the City of St. Paul Mr. Carlone: -we're not parking; it's our construction field office; if the city removes this equipment and we lost money on it, we would sue the city under the 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution Ms. Moermond: -you have every ability to remove it on your own -right now, you've got problems with these vehicles lacking current tabs, which constitutes a nuisance; they appear inoperable and they are parked on an unapproved surface -you laid down what appears to be class 5 but under the Zoning Code, you need to have a site plan and class 5 is not an acceptable surface for a new parking surface, which is what you have right now; and parking on a vacant lot is prohibited; parking is an accessory use and there is no primary use since there is no residential or commercial structure present and it's not under construction to which it would be accessory uses -I can't do much for you; you have to rectify those problems in order for the vehicles to be present there Mr. Carlone: -all we're lacking is a building permit; that equipment you use on construction jobs; you cannot go on a decent construction job without having some type of field office there Ms. Moermond: -you can square up what a decent field office looks like with the Building Official and proper storage of bldg materials for what's under construction but from a nuisance code perspective, these vehicles don't pass muster; so, I'm sorry that I couldn't be more generous Mr. Carlone: -you're burdening me my wife & I; we're over age 80 and we're living on fixed income trying to get a mortgage to do this job; and we've already contacted this Advanced Surveying Company; they're going to email me a contract to survey it; that's the first thing I need before I can submit my plan to the CAAPB and then get the bldg permit Ms. Moermond: -enforcement of the code evenly, I do not see as a burden on you; as it stands, this is a code violation and the Vehicle Abatement Order, I would recommend that the Council deny your appeal and grant an extension to Dec 14, 2016 -City Council Public Hearing is Dec 7, 2016, so you can go talk to the CC about it and they may decide to do something other than I'm recommending -the way this is right now, it constitutes a nuisance; the Orders are correct as written Mr. Carlone: -that property is bought and paid for and it's private property and if the city went on there for any reason, it'd be trespassing; and if they removed anything, it would be unlawful search & seizure; and I don't think you want to face federal charges Ms. Moermond: -I thinks that is something that you want to talk to attorneys about -I will make sure that code enforcement officers are aware that those are concerns of yours Grant the appeal on the Summary Abatement Order as the items were abated; deny the appeal and grant an extension to December 14, 2016 to remove the vehicles.
Action text: Referred to the Cit