HonorVeteransExposeSt.PaulGovernmentPonziTaxingConspiracyMurderbyCondemnations

                                        Sat.9Nov2019  Forensic Files Wed.13Nov2019

                       Honor our Veterans, Widow Sharon acquired all Propertys before Coveture .

                        Ted Sick to my Stomach as Similar Situation happend to Disabled Sharon and 2nd Husband Cpl James R. Anderson. triggering heinous PTSD on a Marine and his Wife.  NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON FRAUD OR MURDER.re SharonScarrella Home with Tenants in Common. at Homestead 1058 Summitt Ave.St. Paul,MN 55105  Taxes paid,Flipped over 10 times without Just Compensations.                     

                                 QUESTIONS

                    Has City Council enbanc,Mayor and City Attorney created Heinous,Bizzare Issues via Revenue Raising Resolutions without Due Process's,Quiet Titles,Owenship,Clairfication of Bogus DSI Building Inspectors unk, to create Invalid Invoices,scattered dates to force hearings before Marcia Mormond, Jurisdiction/Authority, illegal delegation of Power, plus 4.5% interest if not paid.?

                  Secret hearing involving Federal Case Law ie City Chicago vs Federal Communications Commission

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc March 22, 2000* ?

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondents.

                          Sharon by and thro Grace of God must challenge Citys Condemnations

                         In 603 Edmund St. Paul,MN City arbitrarily Condemn,Order to Vacate, Kidney Dyalis Patient, Denys the Pettiford and Family to pay the alleged Tax Lien then on Council Agenda Wed.13Nov2019 delays Forfeitures for 6 months.

St. Paul man's catch-22

11/13/2019		3:30 PM	Council Chambers - 3rd Floor	Meeting details	Agenda	Not available	Not available
11/13/2019		2:00 PM	310W Conference Room, City Hall Closed door session to discuss pending litigation in City of Chicago, et al v. Federal Communications Co 199 F3d 424 City of Chicago v. Federal Communications Commission | OpenJuristmmission, et al.

shows impact of 'accelerated ...

1/13/2019

2:00 PM

310W Conference Room, City Hall Closed door session to discuss pending litigation in City of Chicago, et al v. Federal Communications Commission, et al.

Meeting details

Agenda

RES 19-1917

1

3

Withhold 2019 Tax-Forfeit parcels from public sale for 6 months to decide public use

Resolution

Authorizing the withholding of tax-forfeit parcels from public sale for six months.

https://www.twincities.com › 2019/11/02 › st-paul-mans-catch-22-case-rev...

7 days ago - By Tad Vezner | tvezner@pioneerpress.com | Pioneer Press ... which the foreclosure happened to the home at 603 Edmund Avenue came as a ...

Sicko-City StPaul
603 Edmond Pettifords - Google Search

Saturday, October 26, 2019

Friday, October 25, 2019

CityCouncilAmyBredmoen,MarciaMormondvs603EdmundPettifordFamily2019

Pettiford603EdmondSt.Paul,MN  When Melvin Carter III sponsored Condemnation 603 Edmund 2013 as City Council, now as Mayor Carter HOT SEAT.  2019

RLH OA 19-9

2

12

repurchase application, 603 Edmund Avenue

Resolution LH Other Appeal Type

Making recommendation to Ramsey County on the application of Wesley Eugene Pettiford for Repurchase of Tax Forfeited Property at 603 EDMUND AVENUE.

xx

3 RES
19-1917
Authorizing the withholding of tax-forfeit parcels from public sale for six
months.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Exhibit A_Cover Letter 2019
Exhibit B _2019 Property List w Maps
Attachments:
City of Saint Paul - Meeting of City Council on 11/13/2019 at 3:30 PM
4 RES
19-1926

RES 19-1972

1

12

2019 Election Canvass and Results

Resolution

Canvassing the returns and declaring the results of the City General Election held November 5, 2019. (To be amended with the results of the reallocation

Ord 19-71

1

19

24.03 Financial Disclosures

Ordinance

Amending Chapter 24.03 of the Administrative Code related to financial disclosure requirements.

Ord 19-67

2

20

Ordinance

Amending section 220.05 of the Legislative Code to set rates for base level garbage service to be effective January 1, 2020.

11/13/2019

2:00 PM

310W Conference Room, City Hall Closed door session to discuss pending litigation in City of Chicago, et al v. Federal Communications Commission, et City of Saint Paul - Calendaral.

Meeting details

Agenda

1/6/2019

3:30 PM

Council Chambers - 3rd Floor Public Hearings at 3:30 and 5:30 p.m.

Meeting details

Agenda

Not available

Video

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com    http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

http://sharonsfreedomlawschool.blogspot.com

http://sharonsenate64.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon
v. Arch

CitySt.PaulPonziTaxingTrashInspectionsvsSharon4AndersonProtectedClass

Sent: 5/23/2019 3:04:55 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: Mayor's Staff | AffiantWidowSharonScarrellaAndersonWhistleblowervsCitySt.PaulFraudInvoices4.5%interest

https://thefederalistpapers.org/us/us-constitution-vs-sharia-law-compared-in-6-brutal-ways

                                               Thurs.23May2019

                           To the Above Named,Mayor,CityAttorney,Council enbanc,Media et al

                RULING CASES,NOTICES,FORE
Anderson+Advocates,http://www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocatesNSIC FILES

Sharon4Council: Sharons Default Judgments v. City St. Paul    

Saint Paul City Council Member - Ward 2

Candidates:

​Sharon Anderson
​Rebecca Noecker

MUSLINS KeithEllison,OmarIllam,MitraJNelson,Mayor Melvin Carter

                                                     COUNT I https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.912

            BY INFORMATION AND BELIEF St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter allege his Religion is the Shilo Baptist Church, QUESTIONS; Has Carter illegally incorporating Sharia Law, to Harass and Steal Private ;Propertys from Christions, White Persons for his apparant Financial Gain and his Endorsement of Muslin Persons, in Pic Above?

                              Has City St. Paul,MN for years harrassed Affiant Widow,Whistleblower,?

                      Current Candidate Ward 2 from her Legal Domicile at 1058 Summit Ave St. Paul,MN formerly Church of Justice Reform, legally incorporated, NEVER went Tax Exempt.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609

https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

Melvin Carter (politician) - Wikipedia

 

Saint Paul City Council from 2008 to 2013.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melvin_Carter_(politician)

 

                                      COUNT II https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609

                       FRANK STEINHAUSER NEVER WITHDREW HIS RICO COMPLAINTS. DISMISSED BY OBAMA BOYS TOM PEREZ,FORMER US ATTRY ASST,HUD,LABOR,CURRENT DFL CHAIR,MUSLIN KEITH ELLISON VCHAIR,CURRENT MNAG, CURRENT VCHAIR KEN MARTIN.

                           City send Fraudulent Invoices, Stale Dated, no signatures, Deceptive Billings, sent via US MAILS.

Magner v. Gallagher - SCOTUSblog

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/magner-v-gallagher/

Magner v. Gallagher ... 10-1032, 8th Cir. Not Argued, Feb 14, 2012 ... SCOTUSblog Coverage ... Brief for Steve Magner et a

                                                  COUNT III 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-96

DNHPI supervisor Steve Magner, and other City employees violated Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended by the Fair Housing Act Amendments of 1988 (Fair Housing Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619 (2000); 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, 1983, 1985 (2000); and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (2000), through their enforcement actions. Plaintiffs also make claims under Minnesota law for abuse of process, tortious interference with contract, and tortious interference with business expectancy. In addition, plaintiffs Thomas J. Gallagher, Joseph J. Collins, Troy Allison, Jeff and Sara Kubitschek, Dadder’s Properties, LLC, Dadder’s Estates, LLC, Dadder’s Enterprises, LLC, and Dadder’s Holdings, LLC (collectively, Gallagher plaintiffs) assert an antitrust claim under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2, 13, 18 (2000), and claim that chapters 34, 43, 45, and 51 of the St. Paul Legislative Code are unconstitutionally vague. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and dismisses all three cases.2

https://taxthemax.blogspot.com/2019/01/citystpaulamybrendmoenmikehahncomplicit.html

What Franchise Tax Board v. HyattAdds to the Discussion of Stare Decisis and Reliance

By Vikram David Amar

322922410053 SHARON LEE ANDERSON

Affiant, Mrs. Sharon Anderson, having been duly sworn upon oath, deposes and says:

That Affiant has been reduced to poverty contrary to 42 USC 3631 indigent and in receipt of SSDI for disability.Statutes Enforced

Conspiracy Against Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241. Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights conspiracy statute. Section 241 makes it unlawful

Criminal Interference with Right to Fair Housing, 42 U.S.C. § 3631. Section 3631 of Title 42 makes it unlawful for an individual to use force or threaten to use force to injure, intimidate, or interfere

Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. § 242. This provision makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected

Peonage, 18 U.S.C. § 1581. Section 1581 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in "debt servitude," or peonage, which

Involuntary Servitude, 18 U.S.C. § 1584. Section 1584 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in a condition of slavery, that

                                        MEMORANDUMN

April 16, 06 Water Shut Off http://www.sharonanderson.org/

April 19th07 Kathy Lantry, Police Stalking Sharon causing broken ankle

Apr24th, Sharons Car stolen stolen out of her Private Property to date

no tickets, warrants, whereabouts of http://sharonvaitkin.blogspot.com/

May 16th 2007, agains Sharons Trailer, Camping Equipment "taken"

re RICO Statutes, without Charges, heinous harm injury

                                         Filing Crim Complaints vs. City Council,Mayor,dsi Parks and Rec et al

       Hanging my Search on your files also  https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

                            Dirty DFL Deleted your Files

                                     Read the biography of committee's Chairman, Elijah Cummings, read about the committee's jurisdiction, and view a list of the committee's membership.

Thank God Found at

https://www.nationalbcc.org/images/stories/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf

The Department of Justice, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the City of St. Paul Obstructed the Committees’ Investigation .............................................. 55 CONSEQUENCES OF THE QUID PRO QUO........................................................................... 57 The Sacrifice of Fredrick Newell............................................................................................ 57 The Chilling Effect on Whistleblowers

Mayor's Staff | Saint Paul, Minnesota

Office of Mayor Melvin Carter
651-266-8510

5/12/2019 2:06 PM

Sharon Anderson

Against

Deceptive Trade Ponzi Taxing Scheme without Valid Complaints to Steal Propertys Stale dated http://taxthemax.blogspot.com and http://depos-citystpaul.blogspot.com Answer Cross http://sharon4anderson.org

1. Assessment Roll J1907E Mailing 3-6-19.pdf pg 20 Sharon Lee Anderson 697 Surrey Av St Paul MN 55106-5521 *697 SURREY AVE *Ward: 7 *Pending as of: 1/10/2019 LYMAN DAYTON ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ST. PAUL LOT 5 BLK 46 Excessive Inspection 1.00 122.00 $122.00 32-29-22-41-0053 Real Estate Admin Fee 35.00 1.00 $35.00 $157.00 *** Owner and Taxpayer ***

RLH AR 19-28

2

47

Excessive/Abatement Service Oct 22 to Nov 21, 2018

Resolution LH Assessment Roll

Ratifying the assessments for Excessive Use of Inspection or Abatement services billed during October 22 to November 21, 2018. (File No. J1907E, Assessment No. 198307)

Dai Thao, Ward 1 | Jane L. Prince, Ward 7 | Chris Tolbert, Ward 3 | Amy Brendmoen, Ward 5 and Council President | Kassim Busuri, Ward 6 | Mitra Jalali Nelson, Ward 4 | Rebecca Noecker, Ward 2

CityAttorney

Lyndsey Olson, City Attorney
15 Kellogg Blvd. West
400 City Hall
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Phone: 651-266-8710
Fax: 651-298-5619

Mayor's Staff

Name/Email	Title	Phone
Camille Tinnin	AmeriCorps VISTA Program Manager	651-266-8517
Chris Rider	Senior Aide to Deputy Mayor	651-266-8535
Daniel Yang	Senior Policy Advisor	651-266-6164
Ikram Koliso	Policy Associate	651-266-8508
Jaime Tincher	Deputy Mayor	651-266-8569
Joan Phillips	Scheduler	651-266-6404
Kaohly Her	Policy Director	651-266-8516
Liz Xiong	Press Secretary	651-266-8527
Naomi Alemseged	Constituent Outreach Coordinator	651-266-8512
Noel Nix	Deputy Director of Intergovernmental Relations and Community Engagement	651-266-8509
Peter Leggett	Communications Director	651-266-8518
Russ Stark	Chief Resilience Officer	651-266-8511
Tarek Tomes	Chief Innovation Officer	651-266-6757
ThaoMee Xiong	Director of Intergovernmental Relations	651-266-8505
Toni Newborn	Chief Equity Officer	651-266-6493

xxx

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com    http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon
v. Arch

St.PaulPonzitaxingSchemeCharterComplicityOrd19-17TaxesOrd.19-18PenaltySharonsObjections

Sent: 4/29/2019 2:14:34 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: 2019Ordinance19-18PenaltysVOTENOCharter/Constitution

                                   Mon29Apr2019

           TO THE ABOVE NAMED; Mayor Melvin Carter in his Offical and Personal Capacitys, Council EnBanc,City Attorney, JohnChoi Ramsey Co Attorney,Official Capacity,Elections,Co Board enbanc,Auditor Chris Samuels et al,MNAG Keith Ellison,John and Jane Doe, severally,individually, personal and Official Capactys.

                                   QUESTIONS

            HOW MANY CITIZENS HAVE DIED RE STRESS OF DSI HARRASSMENTS?

    HOW MANY LAWYERS ARE GIVEN PLUM JOBS OF JUDGES TO ILLEGALLY

            VIOLATE THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS.?

CityAttorneyHarrietLansing plagerized SharonScarrellaAnderson

Magner v. Gallagher | Oyez

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/10-1032

Nov 7, 2011 - Magner v. ... Steve Magner et al. ... Docket no. 10-1032 ... Thomas J. Gallagher, along with other respondents, were owners of approximately ...

                                     AFFIANT SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON WIDOW QUITAM RELATOR; RULING CASE;

                             Criminal Complaints under Construction

                     However in Lay Language, Tax Statement 2007 City Stole my Car,Trailer, even Porta Potty then charge re Assessments www.sharon4anderson.org

                           up to the Present 2019 Tax Statement Excessive Consumption/Inspections www.taxthemax.blogspot.com with 4.5 interest compounded annually, daily is Illegal.

                           Certification/Ratification on Stale Dated Fraud Billings months after the Fact.

                           THEREFORE; VOTE NO ON ALL CHARTER CHANGES

WITHOUT PUBLIC INPUT.  STRICT SCRUNITY

https://library.municode.com/mn/st._paul/codes/code_of_ordinances

                               CONTRARY to MN CONSTITUTION

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/constitution/

U.S. Constitution | Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution

The Constitution of the United States of America (see explanation)Preamble ["We the people"] (see explanation) Article I [The Legislative Branch] (see ...

                           

https://stpaul.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx

City Council

5/8/2019

2:00 PM

Conference Room 310W - City Hall This meeting will immediately follow the Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting. Closed Door Session to discuss pending litigation in Bruce Clark, et al v. City of Saint Paul and 2020 budget implications.

Meeting details

Agenda

https://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/697-surrey3-may09-15pdf-green

.29Apr2019

Sharon Anderson 2008 Property Tax Statements in St. Paul at 697 Surrey - Google Search

37 Ord 19-16 Amending Saint Paul City Charter Chapter 8.02 and 8.03 to clarify
signature and petition requirements.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Letter to Council re Charter Commission Recommended Changes
Public Hearing Notice Chapter 8.02 and 8.03
Online comment re Ord 19-16
Attachments:
38 Ord 19-18 Amending Chapter 6.03.1 of the Saint Paul City Charter pertaining to the
imposition of civil penalties for violations of city ordinances.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Letter to Council re Charter Commission Recommended Changes
Public Hearing Notice Chapter 6.03.1
Online Comment re Ord 19-18
Comment rec'd by Council re Ord 19-18
Attachments:
39 Ord 19-17 Amending Saint Paul City Charter Section 11.03 regarding the City of
Saint Paul’s Property Tax Authority.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Letter to Council re Charter Commission Recommended Changes
Public Hearing Notice Chapter 11.03
Attachments:
40 Ord 19-23 Amending Chapter 91 of the Legislative Code pertaining to adding an
appeals process for persons who wish to appeal water bills, fees, and
other charges imposed under the Water Code, Chapters 85 - 103 of the
Legislative Code.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Proposed Ordinance
Code Change - Redline Form
BWC Resolution 19-442
Attachments:
City

Alisa Lein shared an event.

Admin · April 16 at 5:14 PM

Time to speak up! Tomorrow (Wed) @ 5:30pm. Public Hearing.

Do you think the city council shall have full power and authority to establish, enforce, alter, amend or repeal a procedure by ordinance to impose civil penalties for each violation of a city ordinance (ie. unpaid trash bill, etc)??

https://www.facebook.com/events/556782478146574/

WED, APR 17

Ord 19-18 Public Hearing

15 Kellogg Blvd W, St Paul, MN 55102-1606, United States

See the "ORD-19-18_Civil-Penalty-Referendum-petition_v20190330.pdf" document file in this group for the petition & instructions. We are seeking 2,000+ signatures. PLEASE HELP TO COLLECT SIGNATURES!

If you are unable to attend the hearing, please voice your opinion on the city site:

https://stpaul.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3878243&GUID=F7D7C9C0-E14F-4445-B34D-F330E1A210FF

Created for St. Paul Trash Lawsuit

Dangers Posed by Ordinance 19-18

The St. Paul City Council is in the process of passing ordinance 19-18, in order to grant the City Council exceedingly broad powers to enact and enforce penalties.
If enacted, this ordinance would amend Chapter 6 of our City Charter (our City constitution) to enable the Council to impose an unlimited range of fines and penalties for any conduct that could be deemed to violate any City ordinance.
We oppose this charter amendment, due to its great potential for abuse.
Minn. Stat. § 410.12 governs the process by which our City Charter is amended.  This same statute provides two ways to halt the council’s attempt to enlarge its penalty power.

Request the Council to Vote against Ord 19-18

First, if any member of the council votes against this ordinance, the ordinance will not pass.  Charter amendments via ordinance require the council’s unanimous approval.
Initially, the City Council was scheduled to vote on Ord 19-18 at its April 24, 2019, meeting.  At that time, the council could not get the seven votes it needed to pass this ordinance.  As a consequence, the council rescheduled its vote for Wednesday, May 8, 2019.
Since this ordinance will fail if just one council member votes against it, we urge you to contact your city council ward member.  Let him or her know that you oppose Ord 19-18.
If you are not sure who represents your ward, you can find that information on the city’s website.   Scroll down to click the blue “District Council and City Ward Lookup” button located beneath the picture of the city council, on the left side of this page.Then enter your residential address into the search box found in the upper left corner of the city map.  The response should identify your ward and your city council representative.
We recommend that when you contact your city council representative, you should confirm your communication with an email.  You will find contact information for your ward’s council member at that same page.

Petition for Referendum on Ordinance 19-18

Even if the City Council votes unanimously in favor of this ordinance, we can still defeat the ordinance with a majority vote of the electorate.  This requires a referendum.  The requirements for this petition process are also set forth in Minn. Stat. § 410.12, at Subd. 7.  A charter amendment petition requires the signatures of 2000 registered St. Paul voters.
This referendum petition to require a citizen vote on the City Council’s “penalty power,” is available for download.
For information on current signing locations where you can find a hard copy of this petition, visit:  Penalty Petition Signups.

Ord 19-18    Version: 1 Name: charter amendment 6.03.1 civil penalties Type: Ordinance Status: Final Adoption     In control: City Council     Final action:   Title: Amending Chapter 6.03.1 of the Saint Paul City Charter pertaining to the imposition of civil penalties for violations of city ordinances. Sponsors: Amy Brendmoen Attachments: 1. Letter to Council re Charter Commission Recommended Changes, 2. Public Hearing Notice Chapter 6.03.pdf, 3. Online Comment re Ord 19-18, 4. Comment rec'd by Council re Ord 19-18 History (3) Text Public Comments (13)  Add New Comment 13 records Group Export Date  Name District Opinion Comment Action 4/18/2019 7:45 PM Heather Rowe   Against The city council members and Mr. Cervantes aren't being honest with us. They state they don't want to criminalize people who are in violation of ordinances, yet only 100 criminal citations are issued yearly. That doesn't seem to be enough to justify changing the city's charter. They state they want to protect citizens from criminal penalties as it would make it harder to obtain rentals, etc. What they don't say is that if a civil penalty isn't paid, the city would obtain a civil judgement and collection order against the person. This would affect the person's credit rating and renting ability much more than a petty misdemeanor would. They state the only option they have now for ordinance violators is criminal penalties or do nothing, which is a lie. The have the ability to issue summary abatement and special ***essments against ordinance violators. Don't listen to these liars. Each one who votes for this charter amendment needs to be voted out of office this November.  +2 4/17/2019 10:14 PM Meredith Gillies   Against Previously, I paid $33/quarter, taxes included, for trash. I now pay almost $90/quarter for service of a lesser quality. That's a difference of over $60 per quarter, and over $100 a year! If I had that much extra money in my budget, I wouldn't live in Frogtown. My home has already been invaded once, on the anniversary of my father's death, and they took everything I had of value and trashed the interior of my house. Years later, I haven't recovered emotionally or financially. I already work three jobs: one FT and two PT. The only reason I'm not at the meeting today is I'm at work and couldn't get my boss to approve the time off. I own my property and fix it up to the best of my ability on my limited budget. Imposing more penalties just encourages me to sell to HousingHub, let them bring in renters and not owners, and get out of town.  +1 4/17/2019 6:54 PM Mary Leonard   Against To further penalize individuals beyond late fees is an abuse of power. The majority of the people that are not paying are senior citizens who cannot afford the new and more expensive service. This is very bad PR for the city. It is time that our city and society show more kindness to their fellow human beings. Someday everyone on the council will know the affects of additional fees when they are on a fixed income. It is time the council think of real solutions, not penalties. Admit the error. Take the example of the Community Action Programs that help with energy bills.  +3 4/17/2019 6:03 PM Bruce Becker   Against I am strongly opposed to any and all such penalties for the trash program that continues to strong arm the residents of Saint Paul!  +5 4/17/2019 4:58 PM     Against It's time to admit the trash program is failing miserably. Amy for once do what's right for the majority. This is another attempt to save face and milk the residents of St. Paul out of more money.  +4 4/17/2019 8:17 AM Timothy Frankland   Against This ordinance to expand the powers of the City Council leaves much to be desired. It states (Section 1, Subdivision 2) that the new proposed process for imposing civil penalties must provide for an opportunity to be heard by a neutral party, but the ordinance completely fails to elaborate beyond that. It fails to explain the proposed process for appeal or argument before a neutral party, it fails to explain how the neutral party should be selected, and it fails to state the time frame for such appeal. These are critical details that should be clearly spelled out in this ordinance, not just left for clarification at a later date. If the City Council wants to expand its powers in connection with the imposition of civil penalties, it should thoroughly explain the argument or appeal process to its residents now as part of this ordinance. As currently written, this ordinance should be voted down.  +4 4/16/2019 10:27 PM Ken Rowe   Against The city building official has been caught by the State licensing authority trying to enforce fire codes. His licensing authority has warned him regarding his violation of the MN Statutes, now the city council wants to have the authority to allow their building official to issue fines. St. Paul DSI currently holds more power than the police department yet have limited training and act at the will of the council members. There is no way they should have the authority to issue fines.  +5 4/16/2019 5:51 PM Soverign Sharon   Against Legal Constitutional Notice via Blogs http://bloggin-bitch.blogspot.com 4/13/2019 7:56 PM     Against Hopefully there is at least one member of the city council who will have the grace to vote against this attempt to bully and abuse the citizens of St. Paul.  +6 4/12/2019 4:17 PM CandidateSharonAnderson   Against City cannot by Resolution/Ordinance Unconstitutional Issues http://saintpaultrash.com/downloads.htm?fbclid=IwAR0PrXft5EIk_ARlOa6LS2eQriFtGT0RWmBhfWgiSmtqtbvYuPvBeRrt7sI#CivilPenalties 4/6/2019 10:51 AM CandidateSharonAnderson   Against https://mailchi.mp/78297432aa96/notice-of-joinder-hearing-time-change?e=6b88bf099b also Challenge Marcia Moermond is NOT QUALIFIED to hear all these Cases http://sharon-quitam.blogspot.com FURTHER its Illegal to submit millions of Propertys Dollars via Consent Agenda without Public Consent;. 4/5/2019 5:20 PM       Yet again Amy Brendmoen moves forward with an ordinance making it harder and more expensive for St. Paul residents to stay in their homes. Instead of admitting that the entire trash program has been a failure, she and her council cronies instead push forward with forcing residents to pay more. This ordinance shows just how out of touch Amy Brendmoen is with the wants and needs of her constituents and the greater St. Paul residency. Shame on the council for not standing up for their constituents. +10 -1 1 4/1/2019 5:11 AM Eric Lein   Against A PETITION REQUESTING A REFERENDUM IS CIRCULATING ----- Ordinance 19-18 amends the City Charter so that “the Council shall have full power and authority to establish, enforce, alter, amend or repeal a procedure by ordinance to impose civil penalties for each violation of a city ordinance.” We, being registered voters residing in the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, request a referendum on Ordinance 19-18 per MN Statutes 410.12, Subd.7. +11

RipCplJamesAndersonWidowSharonAnderson

ChrisSamuelsRamseyCoAuditor30yrs

StPaulCoundilThaoPrinceBrendmoenNelsonNoekerTolbertMuslinBusuri2019

AFA.net - American Family Association, Family Research Council Call on Media, Big Tech to Distance Themselves from the Disgraced SPLC

The ad, purchased jointly between AFA and FRC and in cooperation with SPLCexposed.com, calls on Spotify, MSNBC, CNN, YouTube, Amazon and PayPal to cut all ties with the SPLC after former SPLC employees exposed the wealthy “charity” as a “con,” raising millions of dollars by expanding the definition of “hate” while operating an organization rife with racism and bigotry.

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com    http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

http://taxthemax.blogspot.com  http://bloggin-bitch.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," 
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based 
actions. Authorized carriers of this message 
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon 
v. Arch