Tuesday, April 30, 2019

St.PaulPonzitaxingSchemeCharterComplicityOrd19-17TaxesOrd.19-18PenaltySharonsObjections

Sent: 4/29/2019 2:14:34 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: 2019Ordinance19-18PenaltysVOTENOCharter/Constitution

                                   Mon29Apr2019
           TO THE ABOVE NAMED; Mayor Melvin Carter in his Offical and Personal Capacitys, Council EnBanc,City Attorney, JohnChoi Ramsey Co Attorney,Official Capacity,Elections,Co Board enbanc,Auditor Chris Samuels et al,MNAG Keith Ellison,John and Jane Doe, severally,individually, personal and Official Capactys.
                                   QUESTIONS
            HOW MANY CITIZENS HAVE DIED RE STRESS OF DSI HARRASSMENTS?
    HOW MANY LAWYERS ARE GIVEN PLUM JOBS OF JUDGES TO ILLEGALLY
            VIOLATE THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS.?
CityAttorneyHarrietLansing plagerized SharonScarrellaAnderson


Magner v. Gallagher | Oyez


https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/10-1032
Nov 7, 2011 - Magner v. ... Steve Magner et al. ... Docket no. 10-1032 ... Thomas J. Gallagher, along with other respondents, were owners of approximately ...
                                     AFFIANT SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON WIDOW QUITAM RELATOR; RULING CASE;
                             Criminal Complaints under Construction
                     However in Lay Language, Tax Statement 2007 City Stole my Car,Trailer, even Porta Potty then charge re Assessments www.sharon4anderson.org

                           up to the Present 2019 Tax Statement Excessive Consumption/Inspections www.taxthemax.blogspot.com with 4.5 interest compounded annually, daily is Illegal.
                           Certification/Ratification on Stale Dated Fraud Billings months after the Fact.
                           THEREFORE; VOTE NO ON ALL CHARTER CHANGES
WITHOUT PUBLIC INPUT.  STRICT SCRUNITY
                               CONTRARY to MN CONSTITUTION

U.S. Constitution | Constitution | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution

The Constitution of the United States of America (see explanation)Preamble ["We the people"] (see explanation) Article I [The Legislative Branch] (see ...

                           
5/8/2019Export to iCalendar2:00 PMConference Room 310W - City Hall
This meeting will immediately follow the Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting. Closed Door Session to discuss pending litigation in Bruce Clark, et al v. City of Saint Paul and 2020 budget implications.		Meeting detailsAgenda Agenda




PROPERTY ADDRESS / ABBREVIATED TAX DESCRIPTION Ramsey County Web: www.co.ramsey.mn.u...






.29Apr2019




37 Ord 19-16 Amending Saint Paul City Charter Chapter 8.02 and 8.03 to clarify
signature and petition requirements.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Letter to Council re Charter Commission Recommended Changes
Public Hearing Notice Chapter 8.02 and 8.03
Online comment re Ord 19-16
Attachments:
38 Ord 19-18 Amending Chapter 6.03.1 of the Saint Paul City Charter pertaining to the
imposition of civil penalties for violations of city ordinances.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Letter to Council re Charter Commission Recommended Changes
Public Hearing Notice Chapter 6.03.1
Online Comment re Ord 19-18
Comment rec'd by Council re Ord 19-18
Attachments:
39 Ord 19-17 Amending Saint Paul City Charter Section 11.03 regarding the City of
Saint Paul’s Property Tax Authority.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Letter to Council re Charter Commission Recommended Changes
Public Hearing Notice Chapter 11.03
Attachments:
40 Ord 19-23 Amending Chapter 91 of the Legislative Code pertaining to adding an
appeals process for persons who wish to appeal water bills, fees, and
other charges imposed under the Water Code, Chapters 85 - 103 of the
Legislative Code.
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Proposed Ordinance
Code Change - Redline Form
BWC Resolution 19-442
Attachments:
City







Alisa Lein shared an event.
Admin · April 16 at 5:14 PM
Time to speak up! Tomorrow (Wed) @ 5:30pm. Public Hearing.

Do you think the city council shall have full power and authority to establish, enforce, alter, amend or repeal a procedure by ordinance to impose civil penalties for each violation of a city ordinance (ie. unpaid trash bill, etc)??
https://www.facebook.com/events/556782478146574/
WED, APR 17
Ord 19-18 Public Hearing
15 Kellogg Blvd W, St Paul, MN 55102-1606, United States
See the "ORD-19-18_Civil-Penalty-Referendum-petition_v20190330.pdf" document file in this group for the petition & instructions. We are seeking 2,000+ signatures. PLEASE HELP TO COLLECT SIGNATURES!

If you are unable to attend the hearing, please voice your opinion on the city site:

https://stpaul.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3878243&GUID=F7D7C9C0-E14F-4445-B34D-F330E1A210FF
Created for St. Paul Trash Lawsuit

Dangers Posed by Ordinance 19-18

The St. Paul City Council is in the process of passing ordinance 19-18, in order to grant the City Council exceedingly broad powers to enact and enforce penalties.
If enacted, this ordinance would amend Chapter 6 of our City Charter (our City constitution) to enable the Council to impose an unlimited range of fines and penalties for any conduct that could be deemed to violate any City ordinance.
We oppose this charter amendment, due to its great potential for abuse.
Minn. Stat. § 410.12 governs the process by which our City Charter is amended.  This same statute provides two ways to halt the council’s attempt to enlarge its penalty power.

Request the Council to Vote against Ord 19-18

First, if any member of the council votes against this ordinance, the ordinance will not pass.  Charter amendments via ordinance require the council’s unanimous approval.
Initially, the City Council was scheduled to vote on Ord 19-18 at its April 24, 2019, meeting.  At that time, the council could not get the seven votes it needed to pass this ordinance.  As a consequence, the council rescheduled its vote for Wednesday, May 8, 2019.
Since this ordinance will fail if just one council member votes against it, we urge you to contact your city council ward member.  Let him or her know that you oppose Ord 19-18.
If you are not sure who represents your ward, you can find that information on the city’s website.   Scroll down to click the blue “District Council and City Ward Lookup” button located beneath the picture of the city council, on the left side of this page.Then enter your residential address into the search box found in the upper left corner of the city map.  The response should identify your ward and your city council representative.
We recommend that when you contact your city council representative, you should confirm your communication with an email.  You will find contact information for your ward’s council member at that same page.

Petition for Referendum on Ordinance 19-18

Even if the City Council votes unanimously in favor of this ordinance, we can still defeat the ordinance with a majority vote of the electorate.  This requires a referendum.  The requirements for this petition process are also set forth in Minn. Stat. § 410.12, at Subd. 7.  A charter amendment petition requires the signatures of 2000 registered St. Paul voters.
This referendum petition to require a citizen vote on the City Council’s “penalty power,” is available for download.
For information on current signing locations where you can find a hard copy of this petition, visit:  Penalty Petition Signups.

Ord 19-18    Version: 1Name:charter amendment 6.03.1 civil penalties
Type:OrdinanceStatus:Final Adoption
  In control:City Council
  Final action: 
Title:Amending Chapter 6.03.1 of the Saint Paul City Charter pertaining to the imposition of civil penalties for violations of city ordinances.
Sponsors:Amy Brendmoen
Attachments:1. Letter to Council re Charter Commission Recommended Changes, 2. Public Hearing Notice Chapter 6.03.pdf, 3. Online Comment re Ord 19-18, 4. Comment rec'd by Council re Ord 19-18
 Add New Comment
Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
4/18/2019 7:45 PMHeather Rowe AgainstThe city council members and Mr. Cervantes aren't being honest with us. They state they don't want to criminalize people who are in violation of ordinances, yet only 100 criminal citations are issued yearly. That doesn't seem to be enough to justify changing the city's charter. They state they want to protect citizens from criminal penalties as it would make it harder to obtain rentals, etc. What they don't say is that if a civil penalty isn't paid, the city would obtain a civil judgement and collection order against the person. This would affect the person's credit rating and renting ability much more than a petty misdemeanor would. They state the only option they have now for ordinance violators is criminal penalties or do nothing, which is a lie. The have the ability to issue summary abatement and special ***essments against ordinance violators. Don't listen to these liars. Each one who votes for this charter amendment needs to be voted out of office this November. +2
4/17/2019 10:14 PMMeredith Gillies AgainstPreviously, I paid $33/quarter, taxes included, for trash. I now pay almost $90/quarter for service of a lesser quality. That's a difference of over $60 per quarter, and over $100 a year! If I had that much extra money in my budget, I wouldn't live in Frogtown. My home has already been invaded once, on the anniversary of my father's death, and they took everything I had of value and trashed the interior of my house. Years later, I haven't recovered emotionally or financially. I already work three jobs: one FT and two PT. The only reason I'm not at the meeting today is I'm at work and couldn't get my boss to approve the time off. I own my property and fix it up to the best of my ability on my limited budget. Imposing more penalties just encourages me to sell to HousingHub, let them bring in renters and not owners, and get out of town. +1
4/17/2019 6:54 PMMary Leonard AgainstTo further penalize individuals beyond late fees is an abuse of power. The majority of the people that are not paying are senior citizens who cannot afford the new and more expensive service. This is very bad PR for the city. It is time that our city and society show more kindness to their fellow human beings. Someday everyone on the council will know the affects of additional fees when they are on a fixed income. It is time the council think of real solutions, not penalties. Admit the error. Take the example of the Community Action Programs that help with energy bills. +3
4/17/2019 6:03 PMBruce Becker AgainstI am strongly opposed to any and all such penalties for the trash program that continues to strong arm the residents of Saint Paul! +5
4/17/2019 4:58 PM  AgainstIt's time to admit the trash program is failing miserably. Amy for once do what's right for the majority. This is another attempt to save face and milk the residents of St. Paul out of more money. +4
4/17/2019 8:17 AMTimothy Frankland AgainstThis ordinance to expand the powers of the City Council leaves much to be desired. It states (Section 1, Subdivision 2) that the new proposed process for imposing civil penalties must provide for an opportunity to be heard by a neutral party, but the ordinance completely fails to elaborate beyond that. It fails to explain the proposed process for appeal or argument before a neutral party, it fails to explain how the neutral party should be selected, and it fails to state the time frame for such appeal. These are critical details that should be clearly spelled out in this ordinance, not just left for clarification at a later date. If the City Council wants to expand its powers in connection with the imposition of civil penalties, it should thoroughly explain the argument or appeal process to its residents now as part of this ordinance. As currently written, this ordinance should be voted down. +4
4/16/2019 10:27 PMKen Rowe AgainstThe city building official has been caught by the State licensing authority trying to enforce fire codes. His licensing authority has warned him regarding his violation of the MN Statutes, now the city council wants to have the authority to allow their building official to issue fines. St. Paul DSI currently holds more power than the police department yet have limited training and act at the will of the council members. There is no way they should have the authority to issue fines. +5
4/16/2019 5:51 PMSoverign Sharon Against
Legal Constitutional Notice via Blogs
4/13/2019 7:56 PM  AgainstHopefully there is at least one member of the city council who will have the grace to vote against this attempt to bully and abuse the citizens of St. Paul. +6
4/12/2019 4:17 PMCandidateSharonAnderson Against
City cannot by Resolution/Ordinance Unconstitutional Issues

4/6/2019 10:51 AMCandidateSharonAnderson Against
also Challenge Marcia Moermond is NOT QUALIFIED to hear all these Cases http://sharon-quitam.blogspot.com
FURTHER its Illegal to submit millions of Propertys Dollars via Consent Agenda without Public Consent;.
4/5/2019 5:20 PM   Yet again Amy Brendmoen moves forward with an ordinance making it harder and more expensive for St. Paul residents to stay in their homes. Instead of admitting that the entire trash program has been a failure, she and her council cronies instead push forward with forcing residents to pay more. This ordinance shows just how out of touch Amy Brendmoen is with the wants and needs of her constituents and the greater St. Paul residency. Shame on the council for not standing up for their constituents.+10 -1 1
4/1/2019 5:11 AMEric Lein AgainstA PETITION REQUESTING A REFERENDUM IS CIRCULATING ----- Ordinance 19-18 amends the City Charter so that “the Council shall have full power and authority to establish, enforce, alter, amend or repeal a procedure by ordinance to impose civil penalties for each violation of a city ordinance.” We, being registered voters residing in the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, request a referendum on Ordinance 19-18 per MN Statutes 410.12, Subd.7.+11
RipCplJamesAndersonWidowSharonAnderson
ChrisSamuelsRamseyCoAuditor30yrs
picture of members of the city council
StPaulCoundilThaoPrinceBrendmoenNelsonNoekerTolbertMuslinBusuri2019

The ad, purchased jointly between AFA and FRC and in cooperation with SPLCexposed.com, calls on Spotify, MSNBC, CNN, YouTube, Amazon and PayPal to cut all ties with the SPLC after former SPLC employees exposed the wealthy “charity” as a “con,” raising millions of dollars by expanding the definition of “hate” while operating an organization rife with racism and bigotry.

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," 
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based 
actions. Authorized carriers of this message 
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon 
v. Arch
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)